<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/03/29/walmat.spring.break.ap/index.html"> College student lives in Wal-Mart for 41 hours</a>
Um..... Okay. Why would someone ever want to do something like that is just beyond me. I mean, I considered "Supersize Me" a stupid movie. Do you really need to eat McDonald's for a straight month to proof your point? Isn't there better ways to proof it? If people can't understand empirical data about fat and calories. Well, sucks to be them. Perhaps they should just weight themselves and try to recall where they have dined in the last month. Regardless, at least there was a <em>point</em> to the movie, albeit a stupid point.
But this? And his associate professor of English thought it was a good idea? I swear, the mentality of an artistic, right-brained individual will forever elude me. Okay, perhaps he could do it just to say he has done it. For experience points for his future writing career. (Frankly, Fear Factor seems a better option.) But a movie deal and a book contract??
What is going to be <em>IN</em> this said book and movie? A 22-year old college kid wondered around Wal-Mart, watching DVDs on display and reading magazines in the magazine section... And I want to spend 2 hours watching this because? What is the point and the substance of this movie?
And, by the way, it has already been done. Funnier even, in "My Name is Earl." I don't even like the show, but the part where they thought it was the end of the world and they decided to live in Wal-Mart was funny. Maybe that's where the 22-year old got the idea to begin with? O.O


